Fórum de debatesFórum de debates: Pergunte aos ArgonautasEar birth; pioglitazone, recovery …Post Reply

Post Reply: Ear birth; pioglitazone, recovery contrived taken?

<blockquote><div class="quotetitle">Quote from Guest on 1 de August de 2026, 02:31</div>Right — been using this thing for maybe a few months now and I keep coming back, so figured I'd chuck my thoughts in since a lad on another thread asked me a few days back. I'm based in the UK, mostly bet football and racing, nothing mad, just so you know where I'm coming from. 
 
What got me on it was actually a bit daft — I couldn't ever work out what an e/w payout actually came to with 1/5 odds a place. Basically I'd wing it and get a shock. These days I punch the numbers in before I place anything, even the boring singles. 
 
The single bet calculator is the one I open most — you put in the price and your stake and it shows the return with no faffing, either odds format. There's also the fiddly ones — doubles and trebles returns, lucky 15s, patents and yankees, and that's where I always got it wrong. If you want a look, it's here [url=https://single-calculator.com]free bet calculator single[/url] — free, no signup. 
 
One thing that actually shifted things for me was the nerdier bits. The implied probability calculator that shows how much the bookie's taking, and there's the kelly criterion tool — I run quarter kelly as the full version is a quick route to a dead bankroll. The dutch tool is decent when I'm spreading across selections. 
 
Not all sunshine though. Its design is a bit basic — no polish, looks like it was built by someone who cares more about maths than colours. On my phone it's fine but the lucky 63 breakdown make you pinch and zoom. Also there's nothing on the app store, it's browser only — fine by me just flagging it. 
 
Right, that's me. Costs nowt, not plastered in adverts, does what it says. If you even now does the maths on paper, have a look — saved me plenty of dumb bets I'd have regretted.</blockquote><br>

Cancel